The Ripple Effect: A Deep Dive into the XRP Ruling

The recent ruling on Ripple Labs’ XRP token has sent shockwaves through the cryptocurrency community. The U.S. District Court Judge Analisa Torres’ landmark decision on July 13, 2023, determined that XRP is not a security when sold to the general public. This decision has been met with jubilation from XRP token holders and has resulted in a significant surge in the token’s price.

A Victory for Ripple, A Blow to the SEC
Ripple Labs’ split-decision victory against the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is seen as a significant setback to the regulator’s “war on crypto.” The core component of the SEC’s claim against crypto exchanges like Binance and Coinbase is that they offered the sale of unregistered securities on their platforms. With the SEC losing on this matter in the case of XRP, industry experts believe this will be a substantial blow to the SEC and its Chair, Gary Gensler.

The Ripple Effect on the Crypto Industry
The ruling has been hailed as a “watershed moment” for the crypto industry. Pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton and Luke Martin, the founder of crypto investment firm Venture Coinist, believe that the decision will aid crypto exchanges Coinbase and Binance in their respective lawsuits. Tyler Winklevoss, the CEO of cryptocurrency exchange Gemini, said the ruling “decimates” the SEC’s case against Coinbase. Following the decision, Coinbase, Kraken, and iTrustShares have already relisted XRP on their respective platforms.

A Word of Caution
Despite the positive outcome for XRP, several digital asset lawyers warn against celebrating too soon. Stephen Palley of Brown Rudnick noted that the summary judgment is only partial and that the ruling by Torres does not set a precedent. It may only serve as persuasive commentary for future courts to follow if they choose. There’s also the chance the SEC may appeal the decision, which presents the possibility that a higher court overturns the rulings made by Torres.

The Complexity of the Ruling
Matt Levine, in his Bloomberg analysis, highlights the complexity of the ruling. He points out that Judge Torres’ decision essentially states that XRP can be both a security and not a security, depending on the context. When Ripple sold XRP to institutional investors in over-the-counter trades, that was considered a securities offering. However, when Ripple sold XRP to retail investors in on-exchange trades, that was not considered a securities offering. This distinction is based on the level of disclosure and the sophistication of the investor. Levine’s analysis suggests that the ruling could have far-reaching implications for how securities laws are applied to cryptocurrencies.

The Road Ahead
Ripple will also need to deal with the SEC’s claim that its CEO Brad Garlinghouse and co-founder Chris Larsen “aided and abetted” the institutional sale of XRP. The SEC alleged $728 million worth of XRP was sold from institutional sales. This claim was set aside by Torres and will likely be contested at trial.

In conclusion, while the recent ruling on XRP is a significant milestone, the journey is far from over. The crypto community will be watching closely as Ripple navigates the legal landscape in the coming months.

ChatGPT process:

Review the following sources to create a blog post about the XRP ruling.

ChatGPT: Please review.

Take a look at Matt Levine’s analysis at and add insight from his article.

Completed draft. I added links and published.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.